Subject: Behaviorist Person From: Judygran@aol.com Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 15:36:54 -0800 Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 11:22:52 EST Application of Stimulus Satiation With a Vulcan Male in Pon Farr by Behaviorist Person The subject, Spock X., was subjected to an abrupt change in placement when his shuttlecraft was decertified for failure to meet fire safety codes. In the new environment, he displayed agitation, noncompliance and loss of appetite. His Behavior Management Specialist, James T. Kirk, charted these maladaptive behaviors but was unable to identify antecedents or setting events. To screen out extraneous environmental variables, Kirk placed the subject in a Skinner Box. However, the behaviors escalated, and soon Spock began to exhibit aggression, disruptive behavior, self-injurious behavior (SIB), property destruction and stripping behavior. Non-aversive interventions including redirection, planned ignoring and differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) were ineffective. More restrictive measures such as mechanical restraints and a prone take-down hold could not be employed due to agency policy and the non-availability of human rights committee review. Spock began to express interest in Kirk's posterior, perhaps because boiled eggs had been used as edible reinforcers in his previous behavior management program. Using the five-step process developed by Knoster, Bambara et al. (1996), Kirk performed a functional analysis and hypothesized, following White (1959), that Spock was responding to a deficit external to the nervous system (i.e. the absence of an appropriate mating partner) which was acting as a strong persisting stimulus. In short, he concluded that Spock was engaging in mating behavior that is adaptive to a Vulcan male in pon farr. Next, Kirk searched for an appropriate corrective procedure. Although, as noted by Carroll et al. (1978), past research had restricted the use of satiation to such behaviors as magazine hoarding, towel hoarding (Ayllon, 1963) and the positive practice overcorrection dressing procedure that Foxx (1976) used with disrobers, Kirk hypothesized that satiation would be effective under then-obtaining experimental conditions. He promptly initiated the procedure. As hypothesized, the satiation activity was terminated by a consummatory response with consequent reduction of need. Moreover, the intervention was highly reinforcing for both men. Kirk decided to repeat the procedure, this time employing a backwards chaining method. At this point, Dr. McCoy, an orthodox behavioral modification researcher of the Georgia School, arrived to peer review Kirk's work. He criticized Kirk for failing to consequate Spock's maladaptive behavior and for inadvertently rewarding him for attention-seeking. However, when Kirk showed him the data, which showed that the target behaviors had decreased virtually to zero after only two trials, McCoy was impressed. "Remember when I said you'd have made a fair psychologist?" he reminded Kirk. McCoy offered to replicate the procedure with Kirk as subject, but Kirk declined. He and Spock departed to a reinforcement-rich environment where they could initiate a regular schedule of stimulus satiation interventions to accomplish skill-building and generalization of their new behavioral repertoire to other settings. Judith (Honest, I swear I am not making this stuff up.)